Skip to content

[Solved] “Logical volume is used by another device”

tl;dr: use dmsetup remove before trying lvremove

Note: Volume group and logical volume names have been substituted here. I’m not entirely sure it’s necessary, but better safe than sorry. If following this, please use the names of your volume group[s] and logical volume[s]

I am in the process of combining fileserver information, and so I have been touching parts of the system not usually looked at in the normal case of day-to-day operations. For some reason, on one of my logical volumes I had created a partition table and added a partition. Of course, that worked normally so there was no reason to be aware of this — clearly I had blanked the fact that I did it at all not long after doing so — until recently.

The Problem

Logical volume vg/lv-old is used by another device.

After copying the data over to a new logical volume, I wanted to remove the now-unnecessary original logical volume that contained the partition. Easy, right?


# lvremove -v /dev/vg/lv-old
    DEGRADED MODE. Incomplete RAID LVs will be processed.
    Using logical volume(s) on command line
  Logical volume vg/lv-old is used by another device.

Okay, what’s using it? cat /proc/mounts reports that it isn’t mounted. lsof and fuser return nothing. Maybe retrying the command will work*… nope.

There are a bunch of posts around this, mostly saying “make sure it is umounted first”, or “try using -f with lvremove“. And the old favourite: “a reboot fixed it”.

Find Out device-mapper’s Mapping

Well, the culprit in this case seemed to be device-mapper creating a mapping which counted as ‘in-use’. Check for the mapping via:


# dmsetup info -c | grep old
vg-lv--old       253   9 L--w    1    2      1 LVM-6O3jLvI6ZR3fg6ZpMgTlkqAudvgkfphCyPcP8AwpU2H57VjVBNmFBpL
Tis8ia0NE

Find Out Mapped Device

Then use that to find out what is holding it:


$ ls -la /sys/dev/block/253\:9/holders

drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Dec 12 01:07 .
drwxr-xr-x 8 root root 0 Dec 12 01:07 ..
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Dec 12 01:07 dm-18 -> ../../dm-18

Remove Device (via `dmsetup remove`)

Then do a dmsetup remove on that device-mapper device:


# dmsetup remove /dev/dm-18

Retry `lvremove`

And you’re good to go with lvremove:


# lvremove -v /dev/vgraid6/lv-old
    DEGRADED MODE. Incomplete RAID LVs will be processed.
    Using logical volume(s) on command line
Do you really want to remove active logical volume lv-old? [y/n]: y
    Archiving volume group "vg" metadata (seqno 35).
    Removing vg-lv--old (253:9)
    Releasing logical volume "lv-old"
    Creating volume group backup "/etc/lvm/backup/vg" (seqno 36).
  Logical volume "lv-old" successfully removed

Bish bash bosh!

Addendum

*: I’m not sure of the thought process behind “just try it again”.

I’m reminded of a short bit of Darrell Hammond’s stand up (paraphrased):

“You know that message you get when you dial the wrong number that tells you to ‘check you have the right number and dial again’? Well, women will check the number and try again. Men will try the same number, but this time we’ll push the buttons a ******** harder…”

8 thoughts on “[Solved] “Logical volume is used by another device””

  1. The design quality behind this stuff is absymal. Maybe the *code* is ok, but the *design* certainly is not.

    I ended up at your post because I got the same error.
    Had been using LVM cache on a SAS SSD and (luckily) have no other wish than to wipe the server prior to decomissioning. It is telling that you can’t even trust LVM enough to be able to wipe it.

    zz:~# ls -la /sys/dev/block/252\:11/holders
    total 0
    drwx—— 2 root root 0 Jul 23 01:52 .
    drwx—— 8 root root 0 Jul 23 01:42 ..
    lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jul 23 01:52 dm-55 -> ../../dm-55
    lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jul 23 01:52 dm-56 -> ../../dm-56
    waxh0012:~# dmsetup remove dm-55
    device-mapper: remove ioctl on dm-55 failed: No such device or address
    Command failed
    waxh0012:~# dmsetup remove dm-56
    device-mapper: remove ioctl on dm-56 failed: No such device or address
    Command failed

Tell us what's on your mind

Discover more from Rob's Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading