<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two Handy Portable Apps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.roberthallam.org/2006/08/portable-apps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.roberthallam.org/2006/08/portable-apps/</link>
	<description>armchair rebel and cheerful raconteur</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:59:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenny</title>
		<link>http://blog.roberthallam.org/2006/08/portable-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.roberthallam.org/2006/08/portable-apps/#comment-124</guid>
		<description>I = most people :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I = most people <img src='http://blog.roberthallam.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://blog.roberthallam.org/2006/08/portable-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.roberthallam.org/2006/08/portable-apps/#comment-92</guid>
		<description>Indeed. I&#039;ve heard good things about Opera for the DS -- overview on one screen, &#039;zoomed&#039; area on the other. Gestures for navigation et al would work very nicely with the touch screen. Pretty clever. Mind you, Opera is a decent PC browser as well.

As for the handheld internet browser... well, the trouble (as I would guess it) would be the price. It&#039;s going to be expensive to produce, and people will expect PDA-functionality from a handheld device of reasonable expense.

I do see something akin to that (or perhaps PDAs in a more powerful form) taking hold in 2-5 years, when [free] Wifi networks will be more ubiquitous. I have Wifi avaliable on just about all my portable electonics devices -- phone (N80), PDA (an old Palm Treo) and handheld console (PSP) -- but I rarely get to use it because there is either no free wifi or it is locked down / paid for.

Speaking of L&#039;il Bill (but briefly lest Nickelodeon sue me for character  infringement) perhaps his Zune - which has Wifi capability - will sport a browser. Of course, it would be IE-based, but most people seem to be able to live with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed. I&#8217;ve heard good things about Opera for the DS &#8212; overview on one screen, &#8216;zoomed&#8217; area on the other. Gestures for navigation et al would work very nicely with the touch screen. Pretty clever. Mind you, Opera is a decent PC browser as well.</p>
<p>As for the handheld internet browser&#8230; well, the trouble (as I would guess it) would be the price. It&#8217;s going to be expensive to produce, and people will expect PDA-functionality from a handheld device of reasonable expense.</p>
<p>I do see something akin to that (or perhaps PDAs in a more powerful form) taking hold in 2-5 years, when [free] Wifi networks will be more ubiquitous. I have Wifi avaliable on just about all my portable electonics devices &#8212; phone (N80), PDA (an old Palm Treo) and handheld console (PSP) &#8212; but I rarely get to use it because there is either no free wifi or it is locked down / paid for.</p>
<p>Speaking of L&#8217;il Bill (but briefly lest Nickelodeon sue me for character  infringement) perhaps his Zune &#8211; which has Wifi capability &#8211; will sport a browser. Of course, it would be IE-based, but most people seem to be able to live with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hanretty</title>
		<link>http://blog.roberthallam.org/2006/08/portable-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hanretty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.roberthallam.org/2006/08/portable-apps/#comment-91</guid>
		<description>Interesting. Actually, speaking of portable browsers, a friend currently staying in Hong Kong has picked up the (Asia-only) Opera cart for DS. It&#039;s all very nice, and thanks to the touch-screen considerably more intuitive than the (also rather smashing) PSP browser. A bit kanji-intensive I&#039;m told, but it supports an English virtual keyboard.

Why Microsoft - or any electronics-based company for that matter - haven&#039;t marketed a handheld internet browser is beyond me. Strip a PDA of everything but the touch-screen and word processor (making sure the firmware itself is updateable) and bam! Holy sales success, Batman. 

Or not. But hell, it&#039;s not as if L&#039;il Tiny Bill doesn&#039;t have the cash to fund even the most ill-fated venture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. Actually, speaking of portable browsers, a friend currently staying in Hong Kong has picked up the (Asia-only) Opera cart for DS. It&#8217;s all very nice, and thanks to the touch-screen considerably more intuitive than the (also rather smashing) PSP browser. A bit kanji-intensive I&#8217;m told, but it supports an English virtual keyboard.</p>
<p>Why Microsoft &#8211; or any electronics-based company for that matter &#8211; haven&#8217;t marketed a handheld internet browser is beyond me. Strip a PDA of everything but the touch-screen and word processor (making sure the firmware itself is updateable) and bam! Holy sales success, Batman. </p>
<p>Or not. But hell, it&#8217;s not as if L&#8217;il Tiny Bill doesn&#8217;t have the cash to fund even the most ill-fated venture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

